audit.comTalk to an expert Compliance readiness and security engineering, connected.
Explore certification readiness, assurance frameworks, and regulatory controls.
Understand our approach, our standards, and where we’re going.
Application. Identity. Infrastructure. Data. Test the boundaries an adversary would try to cross.
Connect entry points, privilege transitions, and business impact. Document the evidence needed to act.
Six assessment surfaces. Explore the technical scope below.
Authorization. Tenant isolation. Workflow abuse.
Authenticated and unauthenticated web testing; object- and function-level authorization; tenant isolation; session lifecycle; OAuth/OIDC and SAML trust boundaries; GraphQL and REST authorization; injection and server-side request forgery exposure; race conditions and workflow abuse.
Source-to-sink analysis. Build integrity. Dependency risk.
White-box code review; source-to-sink data-flow analysis; unsafe deserialization and input handling; SAST/SCA triage with reachability context; secrets exposure; dependency provenance; build pipeline and artifact integrity; IaC configuration review.
IAM attack paths. Workload identity. Kubernetes.
AWS, Azure, and GCP configuration review; IAM privilege relationships; workload identity and federation; service-account trust; Kubernetes RBAC, admission control, and network policies; cross-account exposure; segmentation and lateral-movement hypotheses.
Data access. Service credentials. Encryption boundaries.
Database authorization, service credentials, row- and tenant-level isolation, backup exposure, encryption and key access, replication permissions, and sensitive data paths. Synthetic records and limited evidence collection keep validation within agreed handling rules.
Prompt injection. Tool permissions. RAG isolation.
Prompt injection across retrieved and tool-provided content; RAG access boundaries; agent tool permissions; excessive agency; cross-tenant retrieval; secret exposure; model-output handling; and the enforcement points between recommendations and privileged actions.
A roadmap for recurring exposure review and validation.
Planned recurring assessment and monitoring services: attack-surface change review, asset ownership, cloud drift, vulnerability triage, detection coverage review, and remediation verification. Coverage, escalation paths, and response commitments are contract-specific.
Our roadmap combines AI-assisted code analysis, attack hypothesis generation, and evidence correlation with expert review. Findings must be reproducible, contextually valid, and traceable to the affected asset.
Model selection and execution environments depend on customer authorization, data classification, approved processing terms, and service availability. Specific restricted capabilities and vendor relationships are disclosed only after approval and verification.
Our approach to trust ↗Deliverables are agreed in the statement of work. A typical assessment package includes:
Affected assets and versions, attack prerequisites, sanitized evidence, reproduction guidance, weakness classification, severity rationale, business impact, and clearly stated limitations.
Prioritized remediation with accountable owners, engineering recommendations, compensating controls, and retest criteria. Findings remain open until closure can be supported.
Executive summary, assessment coverage, material exposure, risk themes, residual risk, and a prioritized improvement plan. Assessment constraints and decisions requiring leadership attention.
Written authorization, named targets, testing windows, approved techniques, emergency contacts, stop conditions, data handling, and evidence retention are established before any security testing. Destructive testing and third-party systems require separate authorization.
Tell us what you’re building. We’ll start there.